Personally think it was worth the gambleHendo wrote:That will be a huge loss. Yet people wondered why he wasn't taken to the World Cup.
I guess we’ll wait and see the full outcome but it wouldn’t surprise me if this is part of the outcome anyway.NathStPaul wrote:I see this as a missed opportunity from the FA. I accept he should have had a game ban but why not use this as a chance to get a top Premier League footballer to warn young adults about the dangers of gambling? Send Toney out on community service as it were.
A 6 game ban and three months of Ivan Tony touring schools and colleges, working with anti gambling charities would be far better imo.
Yes, 100%Loafer wrote:wonder if it was Kane who did this, would he have been banned for 8 months
highly doubt itHendo wrote:Yes, 100%Loafer wrote:wonder if it was Kane who did this, would he have been banned for 8 months
by From Despair To Where? » 17 May 2023 20:11
17 May 2023 20:11232 breaches of FA rules is not "a few bets" and if Kane had done it, I would imagine the punishment would be the same.Loafer wrote:this is absolutely way way way too hard for a few bets
hes allowed to start training again on the 17 September 2023 and will return to play again from 16 January 2024windermereROYAL wrote:Well no football in June and July but I`ve just seen he`s banned from all football related activities and that includes training, so would you would think in reality it`s a good deal longer before he can play again.
On what basis? When Rio got his eight-month ban for missing drugs tests, he missed out on Euro 2004.Loafer wrote:highly doubt itHendo wrote:Yes, 100%Loafer wrote:wonder if it was Kane who did this, would he have been banned for 8 months
he is the FA golden child isnt heSanguine wrote:On what basis? When Rio got his eight-month ban for missing drugs tests, he missed out on Euro 2004.Loafer wrote:highly doubt itHendo wrote:
Yes, 100%
Rio was already a mainstay in England's defence.Loafer wrote:he is the FA golden child isnt heSanguine wrote:On what basis? When Rio got his eight-month ban for missing drugs tests, he missed out on Euro 2004.Loafer wrote: highly doubt it
Wasn't he also the most expensive British footballer at the time as well?Sanguine wrote:Rio was already a mainstay in England's defence.Loafer wrote:he is the FA golden child isnt heSanguine wrote:
On what basis? When Rio got his eight-month ban for missing drugs tests, he missed out on Euro 2004.
It's not the FA that hand out the bans, its an independent regulatory commissionLoafer wrote:I know that the FA would not have given it to Kane had it been him
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 106 guests