Completely agree however, this is a knock on of the UEFA land grab, adding 2 extra games to the group stage.NathStPaul wrote:Having no replays is madness. Lower league/non league side who are lucking enough to make it past round 1 need that income.
So why have they taken replays away for round 2? I kinda get taking the replays away after round 3, nobody really needs to see West Ham v Brighton in a gripping 4th round replay.Stranded wrote:Completely agree however, this is a knock on of the UEFA land grab, adding 2 extra games to the group stage.NathStPaul wrote:Having no replays is madness. Lower league/non league side who are lucking enough to make it past round 1 need that income.
NathStPaul wrote:So why have they taken replays away for round 2? I kinda get taking the replays away after round 3, nobody really needs to see West Ham v Brighton in a gripping 4th round replay.Stranded wrote:Completely agree however, this is a knock on of the UEFA land grab, adding 2 extra games to the group stage.NathStPaul wrote:Having no replays is madness. Lower league/non league side who are lucking enough to make it past round 1 need that income.
Its clubs in League 1 and below I feel sorry for. Say by some miracle Gateshead go away to Newcastle in round 3 and get a draw. They could then take Newcastle back to their place, sell it out and finance their entire club for about 6 months off the back of one game.
For me this move kills whatever magic was left of the FA Cup.
Ask an EFL club that has drawn 1-1 at home to City over 90 minutes whether they'd rather chance their arm in extra time - oh, and City will bring on five players worth £50m each - or take a replay at the Etihad. This year, fourth round winners took prize money of £120k. Shared gate receipts from a tie against a PL club are worth £1m or more.Greatwesternline wrote:On the plus side, its easier for a giant killing over 1 leg than it is over 2.
So you may see more giant killings and smaller clubs progressing further and get more prize money that way.
True, but on the one hand, fans blame the authorities for only ever thinking about the money, and then when they announce something that is not based on the money, people blame them as not thinking about the money.Sanguine wrote:Ask an EFL club that has drawn 1-1 at home to City over 90 minutes whether they'd rather chance their arm in extra time - oh, and City will bring on five players worth £50m each - or take a replay at the Etihad. This year, fourth round winners took prize money of £120k. Shared gate receipts from a tie against a PL club are worth £1m or more.Greatwesternline wrote:On the plus side, its easier for a giant killing over 1 leg than it is over 2.
So you may see more giant killings and smaller clubs progressing further and get more prize money that way.
5 minute halves.Pepe the Horseman wrote:They should just play the whole tournament in one day.
Could put on a bbq and have a bouncy castle for the kids.NathStPaul wrote:5 minute halves.Pepe the Horseman wrote:They should just play the whole tournament in one day.
While it might mean more "shocks" as little clubs prove better at penalties it's just another step in destroying the oldest domestic cup competition in the world but then it's already badly devalued with clubs playing partly Academy sides and inconsistencies with VAR being used in some ties and not others. Perhaps they should look at putting the prize money up for winning through a round though to try and counter the loss of replays.Winston Biscuit wrote:changes for everyone just to satisfy 'the big 6'
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 82 guests