Not really sure what to say. I would write a letter explaining the situation, possibly also address one to John Madejski himself.Gregster wrote:I sit in a group of friends (6 in total sat 2 in front of 4). We all renewed, some by the 'net, some by the paper / mail / fax process.
We sit in East stand, row X & Y.
We all got our text messages to confirm the ST applications were processed, etc and all happy.
However, one of my friends got a call the other day to tell him that somehow, his seat had been sold to a new ST holder but that they had reserved him a seat in Row B in the next block over if he wanted it.
This is my fave bit: to address his complaints, they offered to still only charge him the renewal price and not the price for a brand new season ticket. Wow, now that's very generous. Allow him to pay the same as he thought he had to renew his seat but then move him waaaaaaaaay down the stand.
RFC absolutely will not change the seats over. He's had his seat for years and yet they would rather move him than make the call to the new applicant sat in his seat.
Anyone else had any probs yet? If anyones had any success in RFC admitting their fault and re-instating their original ST seat, please post or PM me.
Cheers all.
Agree with that.RIP ELM Park wrote:Although it's not directly his responsibility I would suggest emailing Boyd Butler, he's always dealt with any queries I've had in the past very well.
Failing that Nick Ive will print almost anything about RFC and it dosn't matter if it's not true!
Keep a closer eye on your finances.Bring back the South bank wrote:I was told my money would be coming out on the 1at July. I checked my account on the 10th and thought thats the money I have left to spend for the month. It eventually came out on the 19th leaving me akind.
Kunts
That was exactly my argument. If they are offering him the renewal price, then they are admitting that he renewed and therefore his sale should be viewed as the initial sale.Wycombe Royal wrote:If confirmation was received and money taken when the renewal was made then that sale MUST have taken place before the new application. Therefore I would have thought that the seat purchased rightfully belongs to the renewal.
The only mention of relocating Season Ticket Holders in the T & Cs is that the club reserves the right to relocate STH on a temporary basis due to specific circumstances.Wycombe Royal wrote:If confirmation was received and money taken when the renewal was made then that sale MUST have taken place before the new application. Therefore I would have thought that the seat purchased rightfully belongs to the renewal.
If RFC make the existing fan move to a new seat (I would tell them to get stuffed) then they have got it seriously wrong. It would be interesting to know the legal view on this (if there is one).
Not sure why you say it is not his responsibility - it is as the sales centre manager reports directly to the sales and marketing manager.RIP ELM Park wrote:Although it's not directly his responsibility I would suggest emailing Boyd Butler, he's always dealt with any queries I've had in the past very well.
Same thing happened to a set of friends in the Upper West. She complained and when they told her what they've told your friends, she told them she will be in touch through her solicitor and it was sorted within the week.bobby1413 wrote:Not really sure what to say. I would write a letter explaining the situation, possibly also address one to John Madejski himself.Gregster wrote:I sit in a group of friends (6 in total sat 2 in front of 4). We all renewed, some by the 'net, some by the paper / mail / fax process.
We sit in East stand, row X & Y.
We all got our text messages to confirm the ST applications were processed, etc and all happy.
However, one of my friends got a call the other day to tell him that somehow, his seat had been sold to a new ST holder but that they had reserved him a seat in Row B in the next block over if he wanted it.
This is my fave bit: to address his complaints, they offered to still only charge him the renewal price and not the price for a brand new season ticket. Wow, now that's very generous. Allow him to pay the same as he thought he had to renew his seat but then move him waaaaaaaaay down the stand.
RFC absolutely will not change the seats over. He's had his seat for years and yet they would rather move him than make the call to the new applicant sat in his seat.
Anyone else had any probs yet? If anyones had any success in RFC admitting their fault and re-instating their original ST seat, please post or PM me.
Cheers all.
Yes but your arguement falls down when you take into account that the east stand commoners can't afford solicitors, as we're all struggling to pay off our slightly cheaper season tickets.Sam Tubber wrote:The last response to this thread was brought to you courtesy of Billy Bullshit Productions Inc..
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 95 guests