Like we did away at Luton last year - I particularly seem to remember Marcus struggling with his distribution.Wycombe Royal wrote:Looking at it the other way - will it cause visiting clubs to have a more of a problem with our pitch?
Our pitch is 102 metres long, not 102 yards.Harold wrote:At 102 yards. Just been bored and looking at pitch sizes. Reading have the shortest pitch and nearly the narrowest in the Prem. I wonder if they'll get hammered away from home quite a bit as some of the pitches are at least 10ft longer!
Tis indeed -------> 102 x 70 metres.The Cube wrote:Our pitch is 102 metres long, not 102 yards.Harold wrote:At 102 yards. Just been bored and looking at pitch sizes. Reading have the shortest pitch and nearly the narrowest in the Prem. I wonder if they'll get hammered away from home quite a bit as some of the pitches are at least 10ft longer!
Well, I'm not so sure about how wide it is. They quoted 70 metres when we moved in, and it's changed at least twice since then (once publicly when Pardew narrowed it by a couple of metres, the other quietly when those turning up for the first game one season could have spotted that there was a difference), but at no point has the official width changed.Reading Abbey wrote:Tis indeed -------> 102 x 70 metres.The Cube wrote:Our pitch is 102 metres long, not 102 yards.Harold wrote:At 102 yards. Just been bored and looking at pitch sizes. Reading have the shortest pitch and nearly the narrowest in the Prem. I wonder if they'll get hammered away from home quite a bit as some of the pitches are at least 10ft longer!
We must of played on quite a few narrow pitches last year then!T.R.O.L.I. wrote:Like we did away at Luton last year - I particularly seem to remember Marcus struggling with his distribution.
I would have thought, with the jump in standard, we would be happy with a smaller pitch. Whilst there will be less space for us to attack in, obviously, there will also be much less room for the oposition to play in. I hope that we're not ultra defensive, but nevertheless we will need to keep things nice and tight.alad wrote:So why don't we make the pitch at Madejski bigger? If it suits our players?Wycombe Royal wrote:Looking at it the other way - will it cause visiting clubs to have a more of a problem with our pitch?
Larger pitches shouldn't affect us too much - we know that our players are some of the fittest around so covering the extra ground won't affect them.
Harold, get a lifeJust been bored and looking at pitch sizes.
mathematically_safe but literacy challenged wrote:that means you can legally have a square pitch - 90 x 90??
HTHWarfield Royal wrote:The field of play must be rectangular. The length of the touch line must be greater than the length of the goal line.
So you could have a pitch measuring 90.01 X 89.99 then. Would look square to the naked eye!!That Friday Feeling wrote:mathematically_safe but literacy challenged wrote:that means you can legally have a square pitch - 90 x 90??HTHWarfield Royal wrote:The field of play must be rectangular. The length of the touch line must be greater than the length of the goal line.
Sir, you are a giant in a land of pedantsStranded wrote:So you could have a pitch measuring 90.01 X 89.99 then. Would look square to the naked eye!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests