
(allegedly, and with apologies to Scott Adams)
The forum for discussion on the team, the management, and matches.Z-Head wrote:Correct me if im wrong. But just how is this team news?
Or Policies evenZ-Head wrote:Ok. my bad, I guess!
Just seams more like club politics, general football or anything else.
Or bollocks!
Can't find anything about this on the OS. Could you give a bit more info please?PieEater wrote:Typical HNA, what was meant to be light hearted comment on the management proposing to move 400 supporters in the East stand turns into open season for pedants debating which forum it should be in
It's nothing official, the clubs planning application for expanding the stadium shows East stand rows X to DD and seats 120-190 (approx) as being replaced by either a new disabled area or a "Corporate Hospitality Suite" depending on which drawing you believe. Strangely these public documents have now been removed.strap wrote:Can't find anything about this on the OS. Could you give a bit more info please?PieEater wrote:Typical HNA, what was meant to be light hearted comment on the management proposing to move 400 supporters in the East stand turns into open season for pedants debating which forum it should be in
I can see the "Club is increasing capacity and therefore legally needs to increase the disabled and hospitality seating" parallels.PieEater wrote:Different thread Zac, but I'm sure you can see the "big club" parallels.
Meaning Steve Coppell and the football management side.PieEater wrote:The forum for discussion on the team, the management, and matches.Z-Head wrote:Correct me if im wrong. But just how is this team news?
Woah there! That includes our seats.PieEater wrote:It's nothing official, the clubs planning application for expanding the stadium shows East stand rows X to DD and seats 120-190 (approx) as being replaced by either a new disabled area or a "Corporate Hospitality Suite" depending on which drawing you believe. Strangely these public documents have now been removed.strap wrote:Can't find anything about this on the OS. Could you give a bit more info please?PieEater wrote:Typical HNA, what was meant to be light hearted comment on the management proposing to move 400 supporters in the East stand turns into open season for pedants debating which forum it should be in
I'm sure you would get the pick of seats in the new upper east stand. You'd be maybe 6 rows back or something.Royal Lady wrote:Woah there! That includes our seats.PieEater wrote:It's nothing official, the clubs planning application for expanding the stadium shows East stand rows X to DD and seats 120-190 (approx) as being replaced by either a new disabled area or a "Corporate Hospitality Suite" depending on which drawing you believe. Strangely these public documents have now been removed.strap wrote: Can't find anything about this on the OS. Could you give a bit more info please?Mind you at least it will mean the moaners behind us will have to move as well and the chances of us having to sit near them again are marginal - hoorah!
I think 12-14 rows up will most likely shift.... (X/Y to LL), a cut and paste, it's 6 if everyone moves back (X/Y to EE), i.e a shuffle.Coppelled Streets wrote: I'm sure you would get the pick of seats in the new upper east stand. You'd be maybe 6 rows back or something.
If the football club have to relocate season ticket holders because of the redevelopment, the fans wont be paying anything extra! There seat will cost the same as it would have done had they still been in the 'lower' east stand. That would only be the case for one season though I'm sure.Royal Lady wrote:surely the cost of seats there will be more expensive won't they, like the Upper West??
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 44 guests