by bb0118 » 20 Apr 2007 23:38
20 Apr 2007 23:38And £5 cheaper in the lower at Spurs than the upper.bb0118 wrote:I should add that im comparing a home ST to an away ST to watch Reading this season. Also note thats its at least £3 cheaper is you sat in lower tier at Chelsea and Everton.
I would be very very surprised if (barring a relegation) prices came down at all.Huntley & Palmer wrote:YAWN, the prices are high due to the capacity. If and when it goes up the prices will come down as we struggle to fill it
I'm never sure what the term 'fan base' means to be honest.cmonurz wrote: I don't actually think we have a much wider fan base than this, so decreasing prices would, imho, then have little effect.
Huntley & Palmer wrote:YAWN, the prices are high due to the capacity. If and when it goes up the prices will come down IF we struggle to fill it
The number of people willing to go to a particular match is how I see it. The fan base increases against Man Utd etc. because of the number of people wanting to watch a match. They are our fan base, because they give money to watch our matches whether they support the team or not.Behindu wrote:I'm never sure what the term 'fan base' means to be honest.cmonurz wrote: I don't actually think we have a much wider fan base than this, so decreasing prices would, imho, then have little effect.
There are a million or so people within pretty easy reach of the Mad Stad. It's not a question of how many might be potential STH, more a question of how many might come once a season if the marketing is done well.
20,000 STH plus 4k away fans plus 10k match day sales should be quite doable in this area.
A truer comparison would be match day prices for home games [as that is what you pay for an away ST]. This makes RFC look really rather expensive.bb0118 wrote:I should add that im comparing a home ST to an away ST to watch Reading this season. Also note thats its at least £3 cheaper is you sat in lower tier at Chelsea and Everton.
Although not always easy as some clubs have a lot more pricing options so you can;t be sure you are comparing like with like.working class hero wrote:A truer comparison would be match day prices for home games [as that is what you pay for an away ST]. This makes RFC look really rather expensive.bb0118 wrote:I should add that im comparing a home ST to an away ST to watch Reading this season. Also note thats its at least £3 cheaper is you sat in lower tier at Chelsea and Everton.
I think most people do understand why, but it still hits them in the pocket...Mr Angry wrote:To try and compare our pricing with that of other teams needs to have an understanding of pretty basic economics before reaching the position of Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells at the situation.
There will be a break point on the pricing where the maximum price is reached, I would envisage it being now. The price won't come down if the East Stand extension sells out or is within a 1000 or so of capacity, I can imagine it will be as the whole of the South Stand would be offered as the away end and the current RFC fans in there would be relocated to an area somewhere else in the ground.cmonurz wrote:I would be very very surprised if (barring a relegation) prices came down at all.Huntley & Palmer wrote:YAWN, the prices are high due to the capacity. If and when it goes up the prices will come down as we struggle to fill it
If they were genuinely 'too high', as oppose to 'expensive' then we wouldn't be selling out every week. I am sure that once the capacity increases, we will achieve, 28-30,000 crowds every week at these same prices. I don't actually think we have a much wider fan base than this, so decreasing prices would, imho, then have little effect.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 57 guests