You're both right.SpaceCruiser wrote:I keep saying that without John Madejski, we wouldn't be where we are now, but my friend keeps saying that he's got a big ego
Coppelled Streets wrote:If I had all that money and a choice of women on my arm, I think I'd date Cilla Black too!
Admittedly he has done it for himself overall, but really, to get to where he is now, he has pretty much done everything as an opportunity to improve the town at the same time as making money. He has also used that to continue his progress. I think we all know still, whatever his intentions, a very good business man who has helped this town and club alot.Dirk Gently wrote:You're right, but he's not done it all out of the kindness of his heart. His investment has, by my calculations, increased at least six fold in the time he's been here. It's also given him massive kudos and publicity, which, of course, he thrives on. Raisng his profile and influence like this has also been worth considerable sums to him as a businessman.
All credit to him for spotting the opportunity and making it work, but don't for a minute believe the publicity that say's he's done it for the people/town of Reading - he's done it to make money, directly and indirectly, and in that it's worked for him spectacularly well.
Why do they have to be mutually exclusive?Dirk Gently wrote:You're right, but he's not done it all out of the kindness of his heart. His investment has, by my calculations, increased at least six fold in the time he's been here. It's also given him massive kudos and publicity, which, of course, he thrives on. Raisng his profile and influence like this has also been worth considerable sums to him as a businessman.
All credit to him for spotting the opportunity and making it work, but don't for a minute believe the publicity that say's he's done it for the people/town of Reading - he's done it to make money, directly and indirectly, and in that it's worked for him spectacularly well.
As you infer, they don't. I'd go as far as to say you'd need both factors to make things work as well as they have. Of course he's motivated by a personal desire to be wealthy but that's doubtlessly been helped infinitely by a genuine concern for both the club and town.rabidbee wrote:Why do they have to be mutually exclusive?Dirk Gently wrote:You're right, but he's not done it all out of the kindness of his heart. His investment has, by my calculations, increased at least six fold in the time he's been here. It's also given him massive kudos and publicity, which, of course, he thrives on. Raisng his profile and influence like this has also been worth considerable sums to him as a businessman.
All credit to him for spotting the opportunity and making it work, but don't for a minute believe the publicity that say's he's done it for the people/town of Reading - he's done it to make money, directly and indirectly, and in that it's worked for him spectacularly well.
99% of the time the can happily co-exist, but I think there inevitably comes a time when they do become incompatible - at some stage JM will inevitably have to make a decision where his financial self-interest will be at odds with what will be best for the club/community/supporters.shadesrwrf wrote:As you infer, they don't. I'd go as far as to say you'd need both factors to make things work as well as they have. Of course he's motivated by a personal desire to be wealthy but that's doubtlessly been helped infinitely by a genuine concern for both the club and town.rabidbee wrote:Why do they have to be mutually exclusive?Dirk Gently wrote:You're right, but he's not done it all out of the kindness of his heart. His investment has, by my calculations, increased at least six fold in the time he's been here. It's also given him massive kudos and publicity, which, of course, he thrives on. Raisng his profile and influence like this has also been worth considerable sums to him as a businessman.
All credit to him for spotting the opportunity and making it work, but don't for a minute believe the publicity that says he's done it for the people/town of Reading - he's done it to make money, directly and indirectly, and in that it's worked for him spectacularly well.
Choose your friends better?SpaceCruiser wrote:Whenever I talk to my friend in Manchester about the subject of John Madejski, we always end up disagreeing. I keep saying that without John Madejski, we wouldn't be where we are now, but my friend keeps saying that he's got a big ego and why does he have to have the stadium named after him?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests