Does he talks on stadium expansions?Behindu wrote:Wasn't the critical comment from thre first edition of Inglis' book and by the second edition he had changed his mind a bit...
He came and gave a talk at the club once and was incredibly interesting and very knowledgeable.
I would think that if STAR were able to arrange a repeat of this there would be quite a lot of interest.....
I'm sure he would, if the demand was there.The 17 Bus wrote:Does he talks on stadium expansions?Behindu wrote:Wasn't the critical comment from thre first edition of Inglis' book and by the second edition he had changed his mind a bit...
He came and gave a talk at the club once and was incredibly interesting and very knowledgeable.
I would think that if STAR were able to arrange a repeat of this there would be quite a lot of interest.....
Behindu wrote: I'm sure he would, if the demand was there.
So his view hasn't mellowed much by then, except for the rarity value of old grounds.In the 1983 edition of this book, I described Elm Park as the least interesting ground in the League. Not much has changed except for it appearing brighter, and perhaps moderately appealing as a post-Taylor relic, in the run-up to its 100th birthday.
I only saw about 2 matches from the Stand at Elm Park.Whistle wrote:There's nothing about the main stand at EP that looks like any Leitch work I know of.
It was probably done on the cheap - I think it was mainly benches rather than tip up seats to start with.
I always though it was the main stand that let elm park down. It was small and dull, and out of scale with the rest of the ground. Given the size of the terraces, Elm Park should have had a stand with at least 5000 seats.Mad Dog's Ghost wrote: I like Simon Inglis's work but his assessment of Elm Park was very harsh. No other terrace shaped quite like the Tilehurst End, Southbank offered a good view, shelter (and atmosphere, on its day/evening) and the Norfolk Road Stand was a 20s(?) classic, again with good views and decent capacity.
And in its later days, it had proper floodlights on damn great pylons which you could see from miles. You don't get 'em like that any more.
After the Taylor report, they had to remove the last 8(?) rows of seats because the stand wouldn't have been able to be evacuated quickly enough.Mad Dog's Ghost wrote:It still held over 3,000 though ... until the embarrassing 'executive' boxes were added. They were awful.
Yes, but the money they brought in probably kept the club alive in the mid-80s.Mad Dog's Ghost wrote:It still held over 3,000 though ... until the embarrassing 'executive' boxes were added. They were awful.
That was actually after the Bradford fire. They just roped the back rows off (before replacing them with exec boxes).Winchester Royal wrote: After the Taylor report, they had to remove the last 8(?) rows of seats because the stand wouldn't have been able to be evacuated quickly enough.
Fully agree with your assessment and not that of Simon Inglis. I am now looking up at an oil painting on my wall, which shows those very same floodlights cutting through the dark night and illuminating the Norfolk Road stand (complete with post Valley Parade fire exit) on a typical winter's midweek match. Maybe we are just blind romantics but I thought Elm Park had fantastic character and atmosphere on those sort of evenings.Mad Dog's Ghost wrote:Used to have a freebie season ticket in 'A' stand (before it became an 'away' section) through my junior sunday side and loved it. The only other people in there were very senior supporters who all seemed to smoke pipes or cigars. I like Simon Inglis's work but his assessment of Elm Park was very harsh. No other terrace shaped quite like the Tilehurst End, Southbank offered a good view, shelter (and atmosphere, on its day/evening) and the Norfolk Road Stand was a 20s(?) classic, again with good views and decent capacity.
And in its later days, it had proper floodlights on damn great pylons which you could see from miles. You don't get 'em like that any more.
Users browsing this forum: Polonia and 66 guests