That's because you're getting on a bit.Huntley & Palmer wrote:If I am brutally honest I don't think it would be worthwhile from my perspective, don't think I would go there. I enjoy sitting down with the odd moment of standing and gesticulating thrown in.
No it would be a giant bouncy castle.Hugo Boss wrote:I would love to have terracing back at football so generally would be in favour of standing areas.
It's the "safe" bit of the terminology that concerns me though. I have visions of some soft material to stop any injuries should someone fall obviously. It will also be covered in squared grids with spaces allocated similarly to seats.
At least you could then have a giant bundle when your team score.Vision wrote:No it would be a giant bouncy castle.Hugo Boss wrote:I would love to have terracing back at football so generally would be in favour of standing areas.
It's the "safe" bit of the terminology that concerns me though. I have visions of some soft material to stop any injuries should someone fall obviously. It will also be covered in squared grids with spaces allocated similarly to seats.
It would, however, leave you even more deflated when you concede.T.R.O.L.I. wrote:At least you could then have a giant bundle when your team score.Vision wrote:No it would be a giant bouncy castle.Hugo Boss wrote:I would love to have terracing back at football so generally would be in favour of standing areas.
It's the "safe" bit of the terminology that concerns me though. I have visions of some soft material to stop any injuries should someone fall obviously. It will also be covered in squared grids with spaces allocated similarly to seats.
What it means is that 59 people who replied are in favour.T.R.O.L.I. wrote:I see the current poll stands at 89% in favour - no doubt pauLOLtheroyaLOL will soon teel us that 89% does not mean most people surveyed would prefer to stand at football...
Well I know for sure of at least one person who voted in favour of standing areas being re-introduced, yet much prefers to sit down at football.T.R.O.L.I. wrote:I see the current poll stands at 89% in favour - no doubt pauLOLtheroyaLOL will soon teel us that 89% does not mean most people surveyed would prefer to stand at football...
And that includes me. I'm old enough now to prefer to stand, but just because you won't use a facility yourself doesn't mean that you can't see why it's needed or the benefit that it will bring to everyone - not just those who will use it.Skyline wrote:Well I know for sure of at least one person who voted in favour of standing areas being re-introduced, yet much prefers to sit down at football.T.R.O.L.I. wrote:I see the current poll stands at 89% in favour - no doubt pauLOLtheroyaLOL will soon teel us that 89% does not mean most people surveyed would prefer to stand at football...
If only you had some nationwide poll showing whether football fans did actually want standing, eh Dirk.Dirk Gently wrote:And that includes me. I'm old enough now to prefer to stand, but just because you won't use a facility yourself doesn't mean that you can't see why it's needed or the benefit that it will bring to everyone - not just those who will use it.Skyline wrote:Well I know for sure of at least one person who voted in favour of standing areas being re-introduced, yet much prefers to sit down at football.T.R.O.L.I. wrote:I see the current poll stands at 89% in favour - no doubt pauLOLtheroyaLOL will soon teel us that 89% does not mean most people surveyed would prefer to stand at football...
This poll is specifically and deliberately NOT asking "do you want to stand up at matches?"
I voted yes, doesn't mean I'd prefer to stand at footballT.R.O.L.I. wrote:I see the current poll stands at 89% in favour - no doubt pauLOLtheroyaLOL will soon teel us that 89% does not mean most people surveyed would prefer to stand at football...
Users browsing this forum: Tinpot Royal and 38 guests