http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manc ... 528581.stm
He's not a half bad player though. Just his attitude and temper lets him down big time. Coppell would never have him!readingbedding wrote:Keegan's got nothing to lose, I would do the same...
But Barton has one aggresive temper.
He should have been sacked on the spot by City when it happened. But then of course they'd have lost out on a nice £5m transfer fee.TBM wrote:What kind of message does this send out to the kids of today?! - its ok you can go beat up somebody and still be a premiership football getting paid thousands of pounds a week
He should be kicked out of football for at least 2 years.
TBM wrote:What kind of message does this send out to the kids of today?! - its ok you can go beat up somebody and still be a premiership football getting paid thousands of pounds a week
He should be kicked out of football for at least 2 years.
'greedTBM wrote:What kind of message does this send out to the kids of today?! - its ok you can go beat up somebody and still be a premiership football getting paid thousands of pounds a week
He should be kicked out of football for at least 2 years.
'greed. Rio Ferdinand can miss a drugs test and get a VERY lengthy ban, yet Barton can slap people about and stub a ciggy out in someones eye. It's disgraceful.TBM wrote:What kind of message does this send out to the kids of today?! - its ok you can go beat up somebody and still be a premiership football getting paid thousands of pounds a week
He should be kicked out of football for at least 2 years.
Is that going to Strangeways or signing for Newcastle?Joey Barton wrote:The first day's the toughest, no doubt about it. They march you in, hand you your uniform and force you to pose for the photographer while loads of fat, tattooed, skinheads shout abuse at you. That's when you know it's for real. A whole life blown away in the blink of an eye. Nothing left but all the time in the world to think about it. That's when it hits home.
TBM wrote:What kind of message does this send out to the kids of today?! - its ok you can go out in the Ding and beat up somebody and still have a shit job in IT getting paid thousands of pounds a year.
I should have been kicked out of work for at least 2 years.
Jerry St Clair wrote:TBM wrote:What kind of message does this send out to the kids of today?! - its ok you can go out in the Ding and beat up somebody and still have a shit job in IT getting paid thousands of pounds a year.
I should have been kicked out of work for at least 2 years.
But his assualt was on a colleague at a training ground. Not during a game, but still during his working hours. As the body responsible for football the FA have a right to take issue with this.papereyes wrote:I don't think it is football's job to punish him for his actions away from the pitch. Rio's drug test was for, effectively, performance enhancing drugs and he failed to take the test so that is something related to the pitch. Likewise, if Barton's assaults had occured on the pitch, then yes, you'd have a point.
So it is up to the community that is football to 'ban' him by not offering him a contract. Sadly, when a killer drunk driver like Hughes can get back into the game, what's going to happen to someone of Barton's calibre? Newcastle wanted to renegotiate the contract but 3 or 4 clubs were prepared to offer more to take him off their hands. It's not Newcastle's fault alone. It's a good quarter of the Premierleague who are prepared to drop 'ethics' to chase money.
Can't help thinking this has been prompted by the case of Ben Collett, as discussed here on this very forum.major psychiatric deterioration in his health that has destroyed any chance he may have had of playing professional football at a high level.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests