by Aly Murty » 29 Oct 2008 11:41
29 Oct 2008 11:41
by SpaceCruiser » 29 Oct 2008 11:56
29 Oct 2008 11:56by rfcjoe » 29 Oct 2008 11:57
29 Oct 2008 11:57by chandog » 29 Oct 2008 12:01
29 Oct 2008 12:01no honestly this is what i was told and in a way it makes sense to meSpaceCruiser wrote:Is chandog on a wind up?
by The Cube » 29 Oct 2008 12:07
29 Oct 2008 12:07by The Surgeon of Crowthorne » 29 Oct 2008 12:27
29 Oct 2008 12:27by Sun Tzu » 29 Oct 2008 12:45
29 Oct 2008 12:45by Skin » 29 Oct 2008 13:20
29 Oct 2008 13:20by Barry the bird boggler » 29 Oct 2008 13:31
29 Oct 2008 13:31
by SLAMMED » 29 Oct 2008 13:45
29 Oct 2008 13:45without the away kit, the club wouldnt be able to rob money off the parents of kids crying because they want a reading shirt and the home shirt isnt out yet sothey have to give in and buy them an away shirt. HTHchandog wrote:I was on a tour of wembley stadium yesterday and found out that because Reading represent Royal Berkshire we are the only club in the country that can wear their home colours (Royal Blue) in every game they play. This is an FA law and has been since the club was founded.
That poses the question of why do we need an away kit when we can wear the home kit for every match?
PS. feel free to say if this thread is on the wrong board
by retro_royal » 29 Oct 2008 14:02
29 Oct 2008 14:02Barry the bird boggler wrote:
by Vision » 29 Oct 2008 15:29
29 Oct 2008 15:29Remarkable Vision would have sufficed.The Cube wrote:
(Actually I only bothered to post because of the opportunity to include "remarkable vision" and "the FA" in the same sentence without having to put a negative in anywhere.)
by chandog » 29 Oct 2008 19:32
29 Oct 2008 19:32He didnt know i was a reading fanSkin wrote:Did the person who told you know you were a Reading fan before he/she told you or after?
by Huntley & Palmer » 30 Oct 2008 12:54
30 Oct 2008 12:54by Morph » 30 Oct 2008 13:22
30 Oct 2008 13:22For Fiction, find Anything Else.chandog wrote:I was on a tour of wembley stadium yesterday and found out that because Reading represent Royal Berkshire we are the only club in the country that can wear their home colours (Royal Blue) in every game they play. This is an FA law and has been since the club was founded.
That poses the question of why do we need an away kit when we can wear the home kit for every match?
PS. feel free to say if this thread is on the wrong board
by Whistle » 31 Oct 2008 15:11
31 Oct 2008 15:11There is perhaps a tiny grain of truth (relevance) in this legend. In the early days of the FA Cup when there was a clash of colours the older club (founded longest) got to play in their first choice. How the legend has come to be assoc with RFC I've no idea beyond our relatively early 1871 foundation/Vision wrote:Remarkable Vision would have sufficed.The Cube wrote:
(Actually I only bothered to post because of the opportunity to include "remarkable vision" and "the FA" in the same sentence without having to put a negative in anywhere.)
I honestly never ever thought i would see this subject brought up again. How lovely.
by Royalshow » 31 Oct 2008 15:12
31 Oct 2008 15:12I told you that months ago.chandog wrote:I was on a tour of wembley stadium yesterday and found out that because Reading represent Royal Berkshire we are the only club in the country that can wear their home colours (Royal Blue) in every game they play. This is an FA law and has been since the club was founded.
That poses the question of why do we need an away kit when we can wear the home kit for every match?
PS. feel free to say if this thread is on the wrong board
by Far Canal » 01 Nov 2008 14:33
01 Nov 2008 14:33It is believed to originate from the season that RFC chose an away strip of blue and yellow hoops. When we played an away fixture at Brighton, who play in blue and white stripes, RFC naturally had to use their away strip. The referee was uimpressed at the prospect of two teams playing in blue and ordered a change.Whistle wrote:There is perhaps a tiny grain of truth (relevance) in this legend. In the early days of the FA Cup when there was a clash of colours the older club (founded longest) got to play in their first choice. How the legend has come to be assoc with RFC I've no idea beyond our relatively early 1871 foundation/Vision wrote:Remarkable Vision would have sufficed.The Cube wrote:
(Actually I only bothered to post because of the opportunity to include "remarkable vision" and "the FA" in the same sentence without having to put a negative in anywhere.)
I honestly never ever thought i would see this subject brought up again. How lovely.
by Samrfc01 » 02 Nov 2008 20:15
02 Nov 2008 20:15Users browsing this forum: Webster750 and 48 guests