I don't think even they knew what they were doing let alone an innocent civilian 100 yards away m8Sun Tzu wrote:Big Foot could you let us know why the stewards were escorting him out ?
But knowing your personal agenda I'm not sure how far to trust your suggestion that a young child (or a rather older child, depending on which post you take as the truth) was being 'forcibly ejected' by 4 stewards. Given that you admit you have no idea what was happening or why I'd suggest any 'evidence' is a bit iffy at this stage. In fact there is no 'evidence'.Big Foot wrote:The kid was crying and being forcedly ejected by 4 big burly stewards - the same stewards who bottled it when Cardiff had a pop on Boxing Day - and he must've been 12/13. He even had on a Reading shirt and was carrying a Reading scarf.
I'm not Sherlock Holmes but the evidence is stacked heavily against them, even you can see that with your blinkered approach.
I think the point is, and you haven't answered it, how do you KNOW he was being forcibly ejected? Is it possible that he was being helped to go for assistance/first aid? Might he have been doing something wrong enough to warrant being frogmarched to a safer place? Are there any other possible reasons why the stewards were aiding him to leave? Were you actually close enough to KNOW what happened or are you surmising?Big Foot wrote:The kid was crying and being forcedly ejected by 4 big burly stewards - the same stewards who bottled it when Cardiff had a pop on Boxing Day - and he must've been 12/13. He even had on a Reading shirt and was carrying a Reading scarf.
I'm not Sherlock Holmes but the evidence is stacked heavily against them, even you can see that with your blinkered approach.
I think you've provided enough 'clarification' !!Big Foot wrote:"Personal agenda" - please clarify![]()
I make an observational post and get this detritus thrown at me
Seems pretty strange that it would be deemed necessary to use four stewards in any of those scenarios!Sun Tzu wrote:So the kid could have been ill and they were helping him to the first aid post ?
Or he could have been lost and they were taking him to his parents ?
Or he could have had his first half of shandy before the game and been suffering the effects ?
Or he could have been yelling abuse at the Forest fans and being given advice on his behaviour ?
If you have no idea what was going on how do you know it was 'shocking stewarding' ?
Or is it just prejudice ?
Let's be fair, there is no evidence 4 stewards were used for anything....RoyalBlue wrote:
Seems pretty strange that it would be deemed necessary to use four stewards in any of those scenarios!
I guess it can seem like that sometimes, you should try experiencing it from the other side though ! I did work as a steward for a while a couple of seasons ago and can tell you some of the stuff that gets hurled at you is unbelieveable. What can happen is that stweards go from one confrontation to another and if you've just been physically attacked or had a couple of people screaming in your face you may just be a little bit sharp with the next person who has a go at you. none of the stewards (AFAIK) and not all of the tangoes are 'professional' bouncers or law enforcers and it's a tough job at times.RoyalBlue wrote:Prejudice it may be, but personally I do feel that some of the stewarding at the Mad Stad is over zealous/bordering on the oppressive.
To be honest I have never heard any stewards being told to warn people for 'shouting a bit' and even swearing isn't something that there is time to make a big thing of. The number of stewards at a game is pretty tiny and there is a huge amount to do that you would never pick up on anyone 'shouting'. You might have to deal with foul language but generally that would be after complaints from other fans or rascist type abuse. It's really rare to take someone out and usually it would be done to diffuse a problem and if the person was warned about 'language' chances are they were doing a lot more than shouting the odd swear word !RoyalBlue wrote:They plead for loud and passionate support but then you get things happening like people being admonished for ‘shouting too loudly’ or being hoiked out and warned for using a swear word (frequently heard on tv) just once!
Doubt it. If it was just a steward (ie yellow jacket, looking after a gangway) he's not really there for that sort of thing.RoyalBlue wrote:Incidentally on Saturday I got the evil eye from one steward for shouting out to the East Stand Linesman that he was ‘crap’. Does that count as a banned swear word at the Mad Stad now?! I was very careful not to use any stronger form of language!
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Orion1871 and 69 guests