Agree, happy with that.Deathy wrote:That's a bloody good squad!
All players had to be 21 or under when the qualification process began at the start of the 2007/8 season.moo wrote:surely players should be under 21??
Thats a bit ridiculous. As soon as they hit their 22nd b-day they shouldn't be eligible.abell wrote:All players had to be 21 or under when the qualification process began at the start of the 2007/8 season.moo wrote:surely players should be under 21??
It would mean too much disruption of squads (is the argument). It's just a cut-off point really - might be more accurate if they called it the U23 Championship and left the citeria as it is I suppose - doesn't really matter though, it's just a tournament for the younger players.FiNeRaIn wrote:Thats a bit ridiculous. As soon as they hit their 22nd b-day they shouldn't be eligible.abell wrote:All players had to be 21 or under when the qualification process began at the start of the 2007/8 season.moo wrote:surely players should be under 21??
All age group football has a particular date as a cut off. If you are under the age for that group as at that date you can play that level for the entire season/competition regardless of if you have a b'day during the time. It seems more pronounced at U21 as its a 2 year cycle rather that a 1 year cycle.FiNeRaIn wrote:Thats a bit ridiculous. As soon as they hit their 22nd b-day they shouldn't be eligible.abell wrote:All players had to be 21 or under when the qualification process began at the start of the 2007/8 season.moo wrote:surely players should be under 21??
'greed.TBM wrote:Pointless tournament.
My memories of Lita are as follows:Silver Fox wrote:My memories of that tournament are of Lita playing really well actually
Hmm, I'm surprised you think that.TBM wrote:Pointless tournament.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 35 guests