(apologies if old news)
Would be bloomin brilliant if they sorted this out!
MurktonThe Rouge wrote:That is 300m from my flat

I believe their plans are to redevelop the stadium to around a 6000 capacity. One would assume plans would be in place to expand to something like 15,000 in the future, and lets face it, that would have suited the old Wimbledon.rabidbee wrote:Won't they have the same problem as the original Wimbledon if they keep going up the leagues, though?
All depends on your perspecive and what you want out of it. WFC said that to convert it to be all-seater would be prohibitively expensive. WISA said that it was a lot more practical and less expensive than WFC said.rabidbee wrote:I thought that the problem for WFC was that Plough Lane wasn't up to League standards.
Plough Lane was pretty grim in fairness, even by the standards of the time.Dirk Gently wrote:All depends on your perspecive and what you want out of it. WFC said that to convert it to be all-seater would be prohibitively expensive. WISA said that it was a lot more practical and less expensive than WFC said.rabidbee wrote:I thought that the problem for WFC was that Plough Lane wasn't up to League standards.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests