with all due respect, you are a tiresome c*ntRoyalee wrote:Lost his man as usual for Charlton's winner today. Well done Doobs.
There's no flak because he was otherwise superb today.Ian Royal wrote:Interesting that Pearce has got absolutely no flak for an abysmal pass straight off the pitch for a corner today.
I think had Duberry been playing and made the same mistake there would have beena lynch mob waiting for him.
One mistake in an otherwise flawless performance?Ian Royal wrote:Interesting that Pearce has got absolutely no flak for an abysmal pass straight off the pitch for a corner today.
I think had Duberry been playing and made the same mistake there would have beena lynch mob waiting for him.
The fact that doobs displayed this sort of donkeyness throughout his reading career and it got old really fast, pearce has done one- and feds actually prevented the corner.Ian Royal wrote:Interesting that Pearce has got absolutely no flak for an abysmal pass straight off the pitch for a corner today.
I think had Duberry been playing and made the same mistake there would have beena lynch mob waiting for him.
No one gave a shit 'cos they were all asleepIan Royal wrote:Interesting that Pearce has got absolutely no flak for an abysmal pass straight off the pitch for a corner today.
I think had Duberry been playing and made the same mistake there would have beena lynch mob waiting for him.
One stray pass which was cleared anyway when he was otherwise the best player on the park for the second time in a week while Duberry let his man go at least once a game for a chance for the opposition and lost the ball 50% of the time he had it by hoofing it back to the opposition? Get real.Ian Royal wrote:Interesting that Pearce has got absolutely no flak for an abysmal pass straight off the pitch for a corner today.
I think had Duberry been playing and made the same mistake there would have beena lynch mob waiting for him.
The point being Duberry would have gotten the flak in exactly the same circumstances.winchester_royal wrote:There's no flak because he was otherwise superb today.Ian Royal wrote:Interesting that Pearce has got absolutely no flak for an abysmal pass straight off the pitch for a corner today.
I think had Duberry been playing and made the same mistake there would have beena lynch mob waiting for him.
No, because duberry is/was crap. It was laughable how a club with promotion ambitions was playing him in the side...in the end it cost us. I still have a memory of playing bristol city and him marking adebola- the type of striker he should have no problems marking and adebola losing him and heading home for their winner- pathetic.Ian Royal wrote:The point being Duberry would have gotten the flak in exactly the same circumstances.winchester_royal wrote:There's no flak because he was otherwise superb today.Ian Royal wrote:Interesting that Pearce has got absolutely no flak for an abysmal pass straight off the pitch for a corner today.
I think had Duberry been playing and made the same mistake there would have beena lynch mob waiting for him.
I'm not knocking Pearce, he was my MOTM.
You mean like against Charlton?Focher wrote:with backs against the wall winning 1-0 with 10 to go Doobs would be the first on the team sheet.
unfortunately that didnt happen much last season and he should have been nowhere near the starting line up.
Hit me with anotherRoyalee wrote:You mean like against Charlton?Focher wrote:with backs against the wall winning 1-0 with 10 to go Doobs would be the first on the team sheet.
unfortunately that didnt happen much last season and he should have been nowhere near the starting line up.
Eh???floyd__streete wrote:I never really shared in the Duberry love that Reading fans had.
I always liked the way it was a 50:50 call that he'd give away a freekick for wearing one of the opposition defenders like a sombrero.For a big lump he never managed to score for us at a set piece either, which just smacks of incompetence in all honesty.
He was at the club for 2 and a half years. That's pretty long term in the grand scheme of things.I never at one point thought he was a long term replacement for Sonko.
Maybe, but I doubt he was a regular in the side as much as Sonko was.papereyes wrote:He was at the club for 2 and a half years. That's pretty long term in the grand scheme of things.I never at one point thought he was a long term replacement for Sonko.
Had he come in for that first Prem season, covered Sonko's injury in the short term, and then we looked at bringing in, oh, I dunno, someone young like Gary Cahill, then that would have been wonderful.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 125 guests