You really are an idiot.Thaumagurist* wrote:Who is "Doobs"?
Pedant.Thaumagurist* wrote:Who is "Doobs"?
Centre back - used to play for Reading last season.Thaumagurist* wrote:Who is "Doobs"?
Or rating him in anyway shape or form. I got slated last season for almost, not totally, pointing the finger at him as the main reason why we didnt go up last season. Our dip (or should i say total capitulation) in form coincided with his return to the team, his style of football and atrocious distribution meant we lost our shape, and other players constantly found themselves covering him as they had no confidence in himRoyalee wrote:ALOL at people rating him above Pearce.
Spot on...but he had experience didn't he?Focher wrote:Or rating him in anyway shape or form. I got slated last season for almost, not totally, pointing the finger at him as the main reason why we didnt go up last season. Our dip (or should i say total capitulation) in form coincided with his return to the team, his style of football and atrocious distribution meant we lost our shape, and other players constantly found themselves covering him as they had no confidence in himRoyalee wrote:ALOL at people rating him above Pearce.
The guy is utter utter shit.
Yep Champions league, and top end of the Premier League.Royalee wrote:Spot on...but he had experience didn't he?Focher wrote:Or rating him in anyway shape or form. I got slated last season for almost, not totally, pointing the finger at him as the main reason why we didnt go up last season. Our dip (or should i say total capitulation) in form coincided with his return to the team, his style of football and atrocious distribution meant we lost our shape, and other players constantly found themselves covering him as they had no confidence in himRoyalee wrote:ALOL at people rating him above Pearce.
The guy is utter utter shit.
Pretty much this ^^^. Putting the ills of a side that couldn't score at home purely at the feet of 1 central defender is a little odd even by HobNob standards.Alan Partridge wrote:He was better than Pearce last season and the season before.
He was consistantly ok for us doing what he does, he was never a ball playing centre half but he was superb in the air, a good member of the squad and he did a decent job for a couple of years. 34/35 now? Clearly passed his best wasnt' the future to keep him on.
He clearly splits opinion but the guy in his career played in the CHampions LEague I believe he won a UEFA cup and a cup winners cup while also playing the vast majority of his career playing in the Premiership. £800,000 he was a decent enough signing for the club.
When you consider Mills was £2million shows you don't get much for your money these days.
Interesting of note that Pearce is the one being looked at as this saviour held back by Duberry playing almost. Almost identical type of players, just that Duberry at 34 is still quicker than him.
Pearce plays the simple pass and looks to keep the ball a lot more than Duberry ever did. He also reads the game better than Duberry and both are slow. Mills will come good also, but both are far better than Duberry - no coincidence that his signing coincided with our collapse, or that Stoke went from strength to strength once he left them.Alan Partridge wrote:He was better than Pearce last season and the season before.
He was consistantly ok for us doing what he does, he was never a ball playing centre half but he was superb in the air, a good member of the squad and he did a decent job for a couple of years. 34/35 now? Clearly passed his best wasnt' the future to keep him on.
He clearly splits opinion but the guy in his career played in the CHampions LEague I believe he won a UEFA cup and a cup winners cup while also playing the vast majority of his career playing in the Premiership. £800,000 he was a decent enough signing for the club.
When you consider Mills was £2million shows you don't get much for your money these days.
Interesting of note that Pearce is the one being looked at as this saviour held back by Duberry playing almost. Almost identical type of players, just that Duberry at 34 is still quicker than him.
Agreed for the most part. Doobs is quite simply an awful footballer. Fair enough he can occassionally get that fifty-pence-piece shaped head of his onto high balls but generally he is terrible.Royalee wrote:Pearce plays the simple pass and looks to keep the ball a lot more than Duberry ever did. He also reads the game better than Duberry and both are slow. Mills will come good also, but both are far better than Duberry - no coincidence that his signing coincided with our collapse, or that Stoke went from strength to strength once he left them.Alan Partridge wrote:He was better than Pearce last season and the season before.
He was consistantly ok for us doing what he does, he was never a ball playing centre half but he was superb in the air, a good member of the squad and he did a decent job for a couple of years. 34/35 now? Clearly passed his best wasnt' the future to keep him on.
He clearly splits opinion but the guy in his career played in the CHampions LEague I believe he won a UEFA cup and a cup winners cup while also playing the vast majority of his career playing in the Premiership. £800,000 he was a decent enough signing for the club.
When you consider Mills was £2million shows you don't get much for your money these days.
Interesting of note that Pearce is the one being looked at as this saviour held back by Duberry playing almost. Almost identical type of players, just that Duberry at 34 is still quicker than him.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 80 guests