
It would be sold and leased back. Its what you do when you're f*cking skint. Wouldn't suprise me if the naming rights also go.TBM wrote:So if they sold Old Trafford, would Utd remain there or are they simply just gonna sell the naming rights?!
They were dumped on big time by the Glazer family who bought United all on credit and then lumped the credit against the club. There are various numbers that get bumped around but United are paying anywhere from £60m to £80m in just interest each year. As big as United are they don't make enough profit to cover that so over the last 4 years the loss keeps building and building with none of the initial credit actually being paid off.TBM wrote:Why are Utd so skint though? - surely one of the biggest clubs in the world shouldn't be 700m in debt
by Barry the bird boggler » 14 Jan 2010 15:40
14 Jan 2010 15:40It surely is the beginning of the end for The Premiership/Sky cash spunkfest. It cannot go on like this for much longer.TheMaraudingDog wrote:They were dumped on big time by the Glazer family who bought United all on credit and then lumped the credit against the club. There are various numbers that get bumped around but United are paying anywhere from £60m to £80m in just interest each year. As big as United are they don't make enough profit to cover that so over the last 4 years the loss keeps building and building with none of the initial credit actually being paid off.TBM wrote:Why are Utd so skint though? - surely one of the biggest clubs in the world shouldn't be 700m in debt
Not sure who did the Glazer's maths before the takeover but they were a long way off with their figures.
The most worrying points are:
Despite getting £80m for Ronaldo United only made a profit of £48m.
The club has none of its own money for new players.
United may have to SELL players to service the debt in the future.
The Glazers may have to refinance AGAIN in the near future.
The club has already drawn down a £36m cash advance on an £80m four-year shirt sponsorship deal that doesn’t begin until the summer.
by Barry the bird boggler » 14 Jan 2010 15:44
14 Jan 2010 15:44In addition one has to say that any incoming chairman/chairmen that have to structure/create debts like that in order to buy a club should fail whatever financial qualification is required by the sports governing body in this country and if that prevents big clubs from surviving then tough bun.Ark Royal wrote:It surely is the beginning of the end for The Premiership/Sky cash spunkfest. It cannot go on like this for much longer.TheMaraudingDog wrote:They were dumped on big time by the Glazer family who bought United all on credit and then lumped the credit against the club. There are various numbers that get bumped around but United are paying anywhere from £60m to £80m in just interest each year. As big as United are they don't make enough profit to cover that so over the last 4 years the loss keeps building and building with none of the initial credit actually being paid off.TBM wrote:Why are Utd so skint though? - surely one of the biggest clubs in the world shouldn't be 700m in debt
Not sure who did the Glazer's maths before the takeover but they were a long way off with their figures.
The most worrying points are:
Despite getting £80m for Ronaldo United only made a profit of £48m.
The club has none of its own money for new players.
United may have to SELL players to service the debt in the future.
The Glazers may have to refinance AGAIN in the near future.
The club has already drawn down a £36m cash advance on an £80m four-year shirt sponsorship deal that doesn’t begin until the summer.
Yeah been all over the press again. What are YOUR thoughts on all this?readingbedding wrote:Their training ground will be the first to be sold.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests