by readingbedding » 15 Feb 2010 14:28
15 Feb 2010 14:28The Premier League is considering a proposal to introduce a play-off for the fourth Champions League place.
The top four currently enter the tournament but the new idea would mean the teams from fourth to seventh playing in a mini-knockout competition.
BBC sports news correspondent Gordon Farquhar said the Premier League has been presented with "a number of ideas for altering the competition's format".
But there will be no changes for three years as the next TV deal is in place.
Farquhar added: "Any changes would need the agreement of 14 of the 20 clubs. But the League says there are many options and nothing has been decided."
The move is widely thought to be seen as a way of increasing competition in the Premier League because Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal have filled the top four positions in five out of the past six seasons.
The proposal was raised at a meeting of all 20 clubs on 4 February and will be considered again when they next meet in April.
The top four in the Premier League is the same so far this season, although Manchester City, Tottenham and Aston Villa are putting concerted pressure on Liverpool, who are fourth.
Two years ago the Premier League was widely condemned for a proposal to play a 39th game of the domestic season in Asia.
The Football Association, the sport's world governing body Fifa and European body Uefa all rejected the idea and the Football Supporters' Federation (FSF) condemned the proposal as being motivated by money, dubbing it Game 39.
by Silver Fox » 15 Feb 2010 15:05
15 Feb 2010 15:05The fact that 3 teams who win nothing get into the champions league isn't going to change, you might as well add a bit of competition to the factFerris wrote:Bad idea imo. It's bad enough that the team who finishes 4th goes into the Champions League, let alone a team finishing 7th.
by Stranded » 15 Feb 2010 15:15
15 Feb 2010 15:15by Silver Fox » 15 Feb 2010 15:18
15 Feb 2010 15:18But on the flip side it also gives the likes of Villa, Spurs, Everton etc the chance to get in as they are more than capable of beating the "big 4" on their day.......Stranded wrote:Interesting - but could end up just giving the big 4 a safety net for CL qualification.
by TheMaraudingDog » 15 Feb 2010 15:19
15 Feb 2010 15:19by Winchester Royal » 15 Feb 2010 15:20
15 Feb 2010 15:20by Silver Fox » 15 Feb 2010 15:22
15 Feb 2010 15:22But surely this would penalise them as currently they're in on merit?TheMaraudingDog wrote:Quite clearly its designed to help ensure that the declining Liverpool team still get a sniff at Europe. Give it 5 years and the playoffs will be extended to the top 10.
by TheMaraudingDog » 15 Feb 2010 15:24
15 Feb 2010 15:24Currently they're not in The Champions LeagueSilver Fox wrote:But surely this would penalise them as currently they're in on merit?TheMaraudingDog wrote:Quite clearly its designed to help ensure that the declining Liverpool team still get a sniff at Europe. Give it 5 years and the playoffs will be extended to the top 10.
by Silver Fox » 15 Feb 2010 15:25
15 Feb 2010 15:25by Terminal Boardom » 15 Feb 2010 15:32
15 Feb 2010 15:32This was my first reaction when I heard the suggestion.TheMaraudingDog wrote:Quite clearly its designed to help ensure that the declining Liverpool team still get a sniff at Europe. Give it 5 years and the playoffs will be extended to the top 10.
by premiership_bound » 15 Feb 2010 15:48
15 Feb 2010 15:48Or at least include them in the play off.Winchester Royal wrote:Give it to the FA Cup winners.
by handbags_harris » 15 Feb 2010 16:02
15 Feb 2010 16:02Stranded wrote:Wasn't something like this used in Holland and proved pretty unpopular?
The Eredivisie has had Champions League playoffs in the past, yes, but I can't speak as to their popularity. I've never bothered to question it, merely accepted that playoffs are an accepted part of football across Europe for qualification for many domestic and European competitions.Silver Fox wrote:Haven't Holland gone further so the league winners aren't guaranteed a CL spot or something?
by Terminal Boardom » 15 Feb 2010 16:04
15 Feb 2010 16:04by Barry the bird boggler » 15 Feb 2010 17:03
15 Feb 2010 17:03by Victor Meldrew » 15 Feb 2010 18:18
15 Feb 2010 18:18by Dirk Gently » 15 Feb 2010 18:24
15 Feb 2010 18:24by Terminal Boardom » 15 Feb 2010 18:28
15 Feb 2010 18:28Which will force up the price of over-paid underachieving players, put more strain on supporters' wallets and have Richard Keys creaming himself all over Mike Wedderburn. NiceDirk Gently wrote:You're missing the subtelty and guile of Scadamore in taking this at face value.
Yes, it looks great for all except the Big 4, because it potentially shares the money around. But isn't it amazing that these proposal surfac e just as Game39 disappears off the agenda. Where do you think these extra games would end up being played after just a few years?
BTW, this thread is probably as good a place as any to report that I understand Reports the Premier League is getting set to announce that overseas rights for the forthcoming PL broadcasting/media rights (2010-2013) will top one billion quid in total, an increase of about 60% on the current agreements which is worth £625 million. So the ever increasing gravy train for the top sets seems set to continue.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 15 Feb 2010 18:55
15 Feb 2010 18:55The play-offs weren't introduced to get more money out of SKY. SKY didn't even exist then, and the overall tv money was peanuts in the mid 1980s.Barry the bird boggler wrote:Another half arsed idiot idea to try and wring yet more money out of Sky and the lame brained punters, just like the FL did 20 odd years ago.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests