Pompey (guaranteed
Bolton (never liked them either, plus I do bear a grudge)
West Ham (pretty neutral on them tbf, but I prefer Burnley, Hull and Wigan)
I suppose I'd rather it be Blackburn, but they seem safe (?)
by Dirk Gently » 27 Mar 2010 18:23
27 Mar 2010 18:23by NR_Royal » 27 Mar 2010 18:34
27 Mar 2010 18:34This. Except I don't care whether its Burnley or West Ham.Dirk Gently wrote:Pompey, Hull, West Ham.
Would all be financial basket-cases and so less likely to be competition for promotion next season.
by SouthDownsRoyal » 27 Mar 2010 18:40
27 Mar 2010 18:40by Franchise FC » 27 Mar 2010 19:11
27 Mar 2010 19:11This ^^^SouthDownsRoyal wrote:West Ham....and 2 others
by Ian Royal » 27 Mar 2010 19:16
27 Mar 2010 19:16by PieEater » 27 Mar 2010 19:18
27 Mar 2010 19:18by Franchise FC » 27 Mar 2010 19:35
27 Mar 2010 19:35But Newcastle were never in financial difficulty. Their problem was the owner was going to make a shed load of loss on the deal if he sold at a lower price, and he wasn't prepared to throw good money after bad - even if he had the cash to do so.Ian Royal wrote:I'm with Dirk also.
Although it hasn't happened to Newcastle given all the lols at their finances before the season started.
by Ian Royal » 27 Mar 2010 20:12
27 Mar 2010 20:12There was a lot of talk of players on exceptionally high wages with no clause to reduce them. Even with parachute money that could have been bad for them. It's certainly not in the same league as the financial problems Pompey have though...Franchise FC wrote:But Newcastle were never in financial difficulty. Their problem was the owner was going to make a shed load of loss on the deal if he sold at a lower price, and he wasn't prepared to throw good money after bad - even if he had the cash to do so.Ian Royal wrote:I'm with Dirk also.
Although it hasn't happened to Newcastle given all the lols at their finances before the season started.
by AthleticoSpizz » 27 Mar 2010 20:16
27 Mar 2010 20:16by Franchise FC » 27 Mar 2010 21:08
27 Mar 2010 21:08and I thought I was the only one thinking that way.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Because of nothing to do with "football"...but just their underhand dealings (and the lack of punishment for cheating)
West Ham
Pompey
and West Ham again
by AthleticoSpizz » 27 Mar 2010 21:27
27 Mar 2010 21:27anything to upset "Saint Trevor of Brooking" lolFranchise FC wrote:and I thought I was the only one thinking that way.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Because of nothing to do with "football"...but just their underhand dealings (and the lack of punishment for cheating)
West Ham
Pompey
and West Ham again![]()
by 'lista » 28 Mar 2010 00:11
28 Mar 2010 00:11by The whole year inn » 28 Mar 2010 02:17
28 Mar 2010 02:17by Jackson Corner » 28 Mar 2010 04:12
28 Mar 2010 04:12Yep with the swine Millwall and Norwich coming up some tasty fixtures next season.Dirk Gently wrote:Pompey, Hull, West Ham.
Would all be financial basket-cases and so less likely to be competition for promotion next season.
by Handsome Man » 28 Mar 2010 11:36
28 Mar 2010 11:36West Ham might turn out to be another Newcastle; I 'd rather it was Burnley or \wolvesDirk Gently wrote:Pompey, Hull, West Ham.
Would all be financial basket-cases and so less likely to be competition for promotion next season.
by RoyalChicagoFC » 28 Mar 2010 13:57
28 Mar 2010 13:57Yeah, Allardyce's misery is my delight (as, you know, a general matter)LUX wrote:out of all the possibles, I'd say
Pompey (guaranteed)
Bolton (never liked them either, plus I do bear a grudge)
West Ham (pretty neutral on them tbf, but I prefer Burnley, Hull and Wigan)
I suppose I'd rather it be Blackburn, but they seem safe (?)
by Sarah Star » 28 Mar 2010 14:00
28 Mar 2010 14:00by SouthDownsRoyal » 28 Mar 2010 15:22
28 Mar 2010 15:22Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests