We received a fee for his season long loan, yes. Same type of deal took Rosenior to Ipswich as well.79Royal wrote:Am I right in saying that we received a fee for Harper, however small? Bit of a surprise he's been released.
Brian Howard > James Harper.Geekins wrote:http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11688_6159810,00.html
by premiership_bound » 17 May 2010 23:39
17 May 2010 23:39by The whole year inn » 18 May 2010 00:20
18 May 2010 00:20premiership_bound wrote:Sidwell at Bristol City next season.
by I was there at Elm Park » 18 May 2010 00:25
18 May 2010 00:25by Royal With Cheese » 18 May 2010 09:48
18 May 2010 09:48Post of the year.premiership_bound wrote:Sidwell at Bristol City next season.
Yeah alright.premiership_bound wrote:...and Sidwell at Bristol City next season.
...or their fitness!!!Dirk Gently wrote:Sc can assemble the 106 squad as much as he likes - what he'll never get from them again is one of the things that made them such a great team and that's their hunger. Now they're older, been there and done that they'll never get that back.
Harper, Kitson are both still easily good enough for Bristol, Ingimarsson and Gunnarsson also good enough though to a much lesser extent. Sidwell is way too good for them. They won't achieve more than they have already with us there, but as part of the right squad could certainly still contribute in a push for promotion.Dirk Gently wrote:Sc can assemble the 106 squad as much as he likes - what he'll never get from them again is one of the things that made them such a great team and that's their hunger. Now they're older, been there and done that they'll never get that back.
Blackweel's penchant for playing central players out wide didn't exactly do him many favours, however as Little stated in our conversation ( I forget some detail as it was a slightly drunken haze) on the train back from Nottingham that of the three games he'd played in recently he'd played well and set up four goals. He feels he has it in him to play at Championship standard, I think he could play at this standard regularly albeit he'll need seriously looking after. Probably too much of a risk in all fairness.Compo's Hat wrote:Shame for Little, Blackwell's style of football didn't really allow him to show his talents.
by Terminal Boardom » 18 May 2010 22:08
18 May 2010 22:08Harps only looks like a better passer because it's a lot easier to pass it to the full-back than forward. Howard has a brain too.Terminal Boardom wrote:No surprise about Blakey. He might get a game lower down but WCBAP for whoever signs him. As for Harps, I would have him back here. WCBAP too though. I am still to be convinced by Howard. Harps is a better passer and is fitter and stronger without a doubt.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 806 guests