Plus it was the Bundesliga ball since Februrary.Big Foot wrote:Friend of mine has a theory that the reason the Germans did so well the other night is because it's a German ball
Don't think so - I certainly have heard it said that Nike have set out to rubbish this ball and so have spent a lot of efforts getting the rumours and the anti-Jabulani buzz spread.Hoop Blah wrote:I agree that it's generally a bit of an excuse, and they trot it out at every World Cup when they come out with the latest technologically improved ball.
Dirk suggested it was a Nike conspiracy on the other thread, but that's going a bit over the top! Balls do behave differently at times, but I think it's quite a bit of fuss over not a great deal.
Then its not the real thing is it? The real ball costs up to £90.leww_rfc wrote:Only have a replica of it, but I think it's an awesome ball to play with. Maybe not for keepers however.
POI - Fella from Cameroon smacked one against the Japs crossbar from long range yesterday.1960 wrote:I think the issue with the ball is not the erratic flight sideways, but the impossibility to keep the bloddy thing down from distance. Ronaldo today was the first player to keep a long shot down - and he has special skills in this deparment. All the others have hoofed it and it's gone straight up in the air and way over the bar. It would have been interesting to see what Beckham would have done with it. By this stage we would usually have expected a few long distance screamers and, apart from Ronnie's hit post today, there hasn't been a single one. So, fewer goals, not more.
But the surface makes it easier for keepers to grip, though. So what they lose in one factor they gain in another.leww_rfc wrote:Only have a replica of it, but I think it's an awesome ball to play with. Maybe not for keepers however.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 544 guests