by Millsy » 20 Jun 2010 23:24
20 Jun 2010 23:24by floyd__streete » 20 Jun 2010 23:34
20 Jun 2010 23:34by Arch » 20 Jun 2010 23:47
20 Jun 2010 23:47by Handsome Man » 21 Jun 2010 00:14
21 Jun 2010 00:14by Flyingkiwi » 21 Jun 2010 05:39
21 Jun 2010 05:39I can't imagine that teams like Italy will be very happy to accept retrospective judgements. Their entire squad would be under suspension for diving before the group-stage had finished.Handsome Man wrote:We have got video evidence for everything that went on in the Brazil game, so Kaka can now be exonerated and the Ivorian and three or four brazilians who also over-reacted to fouls can be suspended retrospectively.
by Maguire » 21 Jun 2010 09:47
21 Jun 2010 09:47by Tony Le Mesmer » 21 Jun 2010 11:31
21 Jun 2010 11:31Arch wrote:I've no sympathy for Kaka, notwithstanding the cheating. In the circumstances he should have kept his elbow down and stayed out of it.
by brendywendy » 21 Jun 2010 11:36
21 Jun 2010 11:36by Terminal Boardom » 21 Jun 2010 11:39
21 Jun 2010 11:39by Blue Hooped Moose » 21 Jun 2010 11:42
21 Jun 2010 11:42FIFA doTerminal Boardom wrote:And who says FIFA will not use video technology?
by Schards#2 » 21 Jun 2010 11:48
21 Jun 2010 11:48by Flyingkiwi » 21 Jun 2010 11:57
21 Jun 2010 11:57by Terminal Boardom » 21 Jun 2010 12:05
21 Jun 2010 12:05They used it in 2002 and they will use it to nail the cheating, diving Cote d'Ivoirian!Blue Hooped Moose wrote:FIFA doTerminal Boardom wrote:And who says FIFA will not use video technology?
by Four Of Clubs » 21 Jun 2010 12:39
21 Jun 2010 12:39... may well have been similar complete and utter 'bollox' from Pearce/Tyldesley whoever - but I'm sure I heard in the Geeermans vs Oz match that they'd been using the JubJub ball or whatever its calledFlyingkiwi wrote:You won't hear me say this often but I agree with Schards. The ball is bollox!
Also seems to have late reverse swing on it like a Waqar Younis delivery and bumps up like Lillee from just short of a length. I'm sure that has contributed to a couple of the goalkeeping stuff-ups we've seen.
by brendywendy » 21 Jun 2010 12:44
21 Jun 2010 12:44by Royal Rother » 21 Jun 2010 12:56
21 Jun 2010 12:56by Flyingkiwi » 21 Jun 2010 13:11
21 Jun 2010 13:11Well...Royal Rother wrote:Bizarre.
From every one of the dozen angles I saw Kaka didn't do a damned thing. The bloke deliberately ran into him, plain and simple, in a premeditated attempt to get him sent off. Absolutely disgraceful. Kaka didn't raise his arm, point his elbow, lean his shoulder into him or anything.
I'm amazed there is an alternative view being offered.
by Four Of Clubs » 21 Jun 2010 13:31
21 Jun 2010 13:31... gone back and done a quick search on 'youtube' - there's three on there for starters - showing the incident & aftermath - albeit grainy - but the CIV player is clearly (as possible) not looking anywhere nr Kaka when he runs into him - he had just tussled for the ball with Fabiano (No 9) and his momentum following that challenge took him in Kaka's direction - he's looking (to his right) at the ball - Kaka (to his left) stands his ground as they collide ... not only that - there's a definite 'shove' motion from Kaka's lower arm.Royal Rother wrote:Bizarre.
From every one of the dozen angles I saw Kaka didn't do a damned thing. The bloke deliberately ran into him, plain and simple, in a premeditated attempt to get him sent off. Absolutely disgraceful. Kaka didn't raise his arm, point his elbow, lean his shoulder into him or anything.
I'm amazed there is an alternative view being offered.
by Royal Rother » 21 Jun 2010 13:50
21 Jun 2010 13:50by Flyingkiwi » 21 Jun 2010 13:50
21 Jun 2010 13:50Well...Four Of Clubs wrote:... and if he was really that innocent - why does he immediately trek bloody miles away from the incident
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests