

agreed really - he was always called upon to do a specific job and he generally did exactly what they all wanted - create a shitload of space to allow the more talented players (I think we can all say LOL now) the chance to play a bit.Hoop Blah wrote:I'm probably in a small minority here, but I think it's a shame. I think he's done a sterling job for his country and given his all when called upon. Unfortunately, since Shearer also retired, we've rarely had anyone better to lead the line in the way he did but also to chip in with more goals.
Well said HB. Representing your country is the biggest honour going. To then turn your back is wrong and should be regarded as a form of treason. To me it smacks of arrogance and this is regardless of the sport. For once, I have to side with Beckham and his approach to representing his country.Hoop Blah wrote: Doesn't matter who it is I never like it when a player retires from international football
Germany 1 England 5Y21_Royal wrote:Heskey was always made a bit of a scapegoat by the press but the honest fact was that with him in the side, England played negative football. Whilst the rest of the world developed fast, counter attacking football, we stuck with the long ball/target man system of which Heskey was pivotal. That was never his fault. The fact that he played so much was just indicative of negative tactics and, for a long time, no real alternatives.
How many England caps does big Emile have, TB?Terminal Boardom wrote:Germany 1 England 5Y21_Royal wrote:Heskey was always made a bit of a scapegoat by the press but the honest fact was that with him in the side, England played negative football. Whilst the rest of the world developed fast, counter attacking football, we stuck with the long ball/target man system of which Heskey was pivotal. That was never his fault. The fact that he played so much was just indicative of negative tactics and, for a long time, no real alternatives.
What was the line up?
Exactly, nearly 10 years ago and whilst Germany developed and improved, we stayed still.Terminal Boardom wrote:Germany 1 England 5Y21_Royal wrote:Heskey was always made a bit of a scapegoat by the press but the honest fact was that with him in the side, England played negative football. Whilst the rest of the world developed fast, counter attacking football, we stuck with the long ball/target man system of which Heskey was pivotal. That was never his fault. The fact that he played so much was just indicative of negative tactics and, for a long time, no real alternatives.
What was the line up?
A lot more than you and me!Thomas L'Heureux wrote:How many England caps does big Emile have, TB?Terminal Boardom wrote:Germany 1 England 5Y21_Royal wrote:Heskey was always made a bit of a scapegoat by the press but the honest fact was that with him in the side, England played negative football. Whilst the rest of the world developed fast, counter attacking football, we stuck with the long ball/target man system of which Heskey was pivotal. That was never his fault. The fact that he played so much was just indicative of negative tactics and, for a long time, no real alternatives.
What was the line up?
I completely and utterly disagree with you.Terminal Boardom wrote:Question is, who else could we have called upon? Bobby Zamora? Darren Bent??? fact is, there is a distinct shortage of ENGLISH centre forwards playing in the PL. Unless this is addressed we will not improve.
Exactly right. What's especially frustrating is the fact that the best PL clubs have done this. Man Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal, Man City all play a variation of 4-3-3 and yet at international level we haven't adapted.Thomas L'Heureux wrote:I completely and utterly disagree with you.Terminal Boardom wrote:Question is, who else could we have called upon? Bobby Zamora? Darren Bent??? fact is, there is a distinct shortage of ENGLISH centre forwards playing in the PL. Unless this is addressed we will not improve.
Out of all of the teams in the quarter-finals onwards, how many played with two up top? And even the one or two that did didn't do so in a traditional 4-4-2 formation.
Heskey should never have started for England in this year's World Cup simply because we should have got with the times and moved away from playing such a rigidly poor formation. The game has evolved, especially on the continent and further afield, and the need to pick Heskey would never have come about if we employed a manager that actually had some tactical variety and a bit of whit.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests