Well I'm already back from the game mainly because I am not back. I'm staying the night in Brum.

That was simply an outstanding performance by us. Just like the Villa game. Birmingham hardly had a touch of the ball. We controlled it from start to finish, were very patient and took our chances when they came. Very impressive.

Everyone played well.

On last train back....Good performance all round and impressed by Bacuna's nice play on the breaks.

We still look vulnerable, but 3/5 at the back really suits us. More of that please

Barrow denied me £44 with that embarrassing miss and Kelly denied me £48 with his sitter too.

The fukkers.

This is all

That was a much better performance after being abysmal at Preston and QPR, from the start we played our game and Brum just sat back and let us.

For a home team Brum were awful, pretty well no pressing from the front which allowed us to control the game. First half we should of gone ahead with the JvdB header that went wide, and although we're a long way away the offside for Barrow looked close.

Second half we dominated again and Barrow missed an absolute sitter, all he had to do was pass it in but somehow knocked it wide. Shortly after we got the goal and that was it, Brum really didn't look like coming back, and our second from Evans just killed it. The home fans left in droves after that goal and there weren't many left at the end. Evans was actually in a similar position and not picked out a few minutes earlier so it's great he got his goal

As I said for a home team Brum were just awful, probably slightly better than Villa but they will struggle if they play like that.

Decent support albeit with some uncomfortable singing about Redknap, and a good pre and post match at Hennesey's.

Not sure if this guy is back yet

The second half was superb. The team showed a lot of desire to keep the pressure levels up after two very poor misses, which is indicative of the improving mentality within the squad. Both goals were very well worked. This team is on the cusp of something special.

Only other thought is that I would rather persist with Bod, who impressed me today, than spend 8 million on another average Championship striker. While a big name striker is tempting, I hope we only go in for the right price.

As the away side that was an outstanding performance today. Keeping the home fans quiet. Dominating play for long periods. Once we took the lead and the game opened up. There was only ever going to be one winner.

Bacuna and Barrow both added something to the side today. Jaap's project is really starting to take shape. Bodvarsson is proving a good signing as well.

Was impressed with Birmingham's no 19, Jacques Maghoma. Very hard working and covered the pitch effortlessly.

Agreed , every time this pineapple head got the ball he gave us problems, just as well the rest of the team were shite.
very good team performance from us. agree with a previous poster. all the panicking about getting in a new striker, but I ask . what can they bring to the team that we don`t already have?
Bod led the line superbly today. holding up the ball well and working his nuts off. a very well taken goal and would have had a second but for a blatant shove in the back when going up for a point blank header.
It`s careful that we don`t get too excited about one result against what appeared to be a poor Birmingham side, but it was hugely impressive the way we were over them like a rash when they had the ball, but played good controlled football when we had it,
A word about Manonne, he looks a real bargain. while he didn`t have much to do today he didn`t give me nervous moments that AHH always did when he had the ball at his feet. 7
Gunter . has his critics , a guy slagging him off in the pub tonight, so he knows better then all the managers that have him as first choice right back, solid ,7
Ilori. He`s always the kind of player you don`t really notice, but does an effective job. 7
McShane. held the defence together well, 7
Moore. solid, very good last ditch tackle late on the maintain our one goal lead. took a knock towards the end, happy for a international break . 8
Blackett. one of his better games. always right up the drainpipe of the Brum players. impressive. 8

Joey. biting into the tackle. didn`t give anyone time on the ball. unlucky to be subbed IMO. 8
Bacuna. played a little too deep on occasions. but got forward to have a hand in the 1st goal, could be a bargain. 7
Kelly, surely destined for better things. a ball of energy, always looking for the ball. 9 (would have been a 10 if he could finish)
Barrow. Good player, decent performance, but my late granny could have scored that. 6

Now the Bod,
If we are going to spunk out 8-10m on a new striker we need to look to see if we have one on our books already.
Yes its only one game. but he ticked all the boxes. held it up well , good in the air. and as stated, scored one and should have had another, a solid 9 for me.

Walking back to the station listening to the Birmingham fans was amusing. time wasting at 0-0, really?
And our bright orange shirts dazzled them. tongue in cheek there I think . lol.

Lastly. the journey up was a mare, train absolutely rammed because Euston was closed for 2 days, coming back was a bit better but not much,
All in all a good day at the office.
Hope those c*nts at West ham don`t come sniffing again!!!

Very pleased with the result and agree with the last poster re: Jon Dadi, Stam has again done some shrewd business so far and hopefully it is starting to show in the performances. Wouldn't bother me too much if we don't bring in another striker.

A Birmingham supporting friend of mine was at the game and sent me a text. He said we were well deserving of the win and should have won by 4. Said we looked very good.

Out of interest, is Mendes injured? Not on the bench again with Sam Smith there instead

My two pennies worth.
Praise where it's due after a lot of negativity. I thought Blackett was immense today as was Moore.
Bacuna and Barrow have brought in the extra pace that was missing which gave Kelly a lot more Impetus.
( I felt previously that Swift was starting to hold play up more and more but that's my opinion).

Overall a positive, enjoyable display and if they can step up a gear against better teams we'll be there at the end of the season.

From the games I've seen Blackett looks a lot better this year at LB. going to be tough for Obita to come back in

Predictable whinge from 'arry. Never his fault is it?

Where are all the moaners and STG's?

It's awful quiet on here

Sounds like an excellent performance and obviously result as well, similar to the Villa game by the sound of it. Hopefully we can add consistency to our game then we can look forward to a good season.

Only managed to watch the second half but have some notes anyway.

The ref seemed inconsistent.
Birmingham couldn't counter to save their lives despite it being their tactic from the whistle.
Bacuna blocked a lot of long passes from midfield. He really stopped their momentum.
McCleary, again, showed how quality he is in a brief cameo. The Birmingham defenders kept back off I really though he was going to thunder one in like he was playing against qpr.
Bodvarsson held the ball well but I felt our tactics don't suit him as well as they could. He's too slow to be tracking back that far or standing out on the flanks. Obviously it worked a few times with him (rather skillfully) knocking the ball back to oncoming players but I feel he would be even better standing with his back to the goal in line with the last man. We have the speed to make that work.
Our 3 CBs look so comfortable.
Blackett, again, at times looks phenomenal on the ball. Confident, skillfull and dangerous.
Kelly was energetic and could rightly be viewed as the highest potential CM in the championship.
Barrow should have scored. He started the attack and looked like finishing it.
Good goal from Evans.

A question for anyone. A Birmingham player pushed rather obviously (Blackett?) Who was shield the ball out for a goal kick into the ball. How was that not a foul? He was essentially barged into and a corner was given.

Possibly a referee finally applying the law as it is written? If you are simply 'shielding' the ball you are not in possession and so you are effectively obstructing the opposition player. If he chooses to go through you to get to the ball then maybe that is fine?

I know, that is not the urgent interpretation. However, it is time that this ridiculous 'shielding' of the ball without ever touching it to bring it under control is stopped. It always used to be obstruction and draw a free kick.

Possibly a referee finally applying the law as it is written? If you are simply 'shielding' the ball you are not in possession and so you are effectively obstructing the opposition player. If he chooses to go through you to get to the ball then maybe that is fine?

I know, that is not the urgent interpretation. However, it is time that this ridiculous 'shielding' of the ball without ever touching it to bring it under control is stopped. It always used to be obstruction and draw a free kick.
Its an interesting question certainly. I would have thought making contact with a player not in possession of the ball is equally a foul?

Looking at some of the comments on their message board...

...it's curious so see that are convinced that we are a poor team who are being tipped to struggle this season.

I appreciate few like our style of play, and 3rd place last year did seem to many like an over-achievement, but I find it weird to think that we are still seen as strugglers in this division.

Perhaps Swift would have have looked a lot better in yesterdays formation. 5 at the back with JVB and Bacuna shielding. Meant the team looked very solid.

Last season we had loads of fans last season convinced we were lucky, over-achieving, we would fade away etc.

It's either true and it speaks volumes for Stam's managerial credentials or it's not true and we'll continue to do well, let them think whatever they want, the only thing that matters is finishing position.

Bloody strange only one page in BFTG. moaners have nothing to contribute this weekend, they must be gutted.

A nice easy walk across town for me one of my easiest games of the season. Beers in town first with some very pessimistic Blues supporting mates got the day off to a good start, which only improved as the game started.

We were comfortable from start to finish and it always looked like a clean sheet as long as we didn't give anything silly away at the back - which we didn't. The quality of chances got better as the game went on and it was a case of when, not if, we would score. Barrow will be grateful to Big Daddy for getting the goal so soon after his miss.

I commented to my Blues mates afterwards that the little number 19 - Maghoma - looked their only threat, and whilst they agreed they also said he'd been awful prior to yesterday.

Mannone looked very assured and made one cracking save. The back 4 with McShane in front nullified Blues very efficiently - special mention to Blackett who had a very solid game. Bacuna was great and controlled the midfield tempo well. Joey quietly effective, Kelly excellent, Barrow decent. Big Daddy up top was superb, linked the play, held the ball, did everything you want from a big target man (including some very nifty skill at times too) - took his goal well and probably should have had a pen for the blatant shove in the back when jumping for a header

They'll be back next time we lose. So we are still at exactly the same point we were last season, I wonder if those that said we are much worse this year still stick to that?

We have the same results in an almost uncanny resemblance, and the same points... but if anything we've played better. Already produced 2 good performances where as last year I thought we started well at Preston but then meandered. The win against Cardiff iirc was far from a good performance.

Perhaps Swift would have have looked a lot better in yesterdays formation. 5 at the back with JVB and Bacuna shielding. Meant the team looked very solid.

Swift has definitely been targeted more, he's been finding it hard to find space to work in for a while now. This is especially true at home, where his performances tend to improve from 70 minutes onwards, as defences start to tire against us.

On the other hand, when Kelly has played in an advanced role, he seems to find it easier to spot pockets of space to work in and is more effective early on in a game as a result. Whether that's because the opposition haven't identified him as a key player for us yet, time will tell.

Swift is a very important player for us, but once he's fit again, I think he would be most effective coming off the bench with 20-25 minutes left.

Listened to BBC West Midlands on the way back and the twatish commentator said it wasn't a good result against the most boring dull team in football (as is also mentioned on their forum). Now I'm no expert but that was not a dull display. Plenty of good forward searching passes, chances and two goals when we also missed some sitters.
Doubt if the twat even saw the game, just commenting on hearsay.
However, this has sadly now become a label for us irrelevant if the perpetrator has seen us play or not, which (knowing football mentality) , will stay with us for years even if we play like 70s Brazil, especially pumped up by the likes of the a**holes from Leeds, Fulham etc.
Well f**k 'em, the table will prove them wrong in the end.

Doesn't bother me in the slightest the 'boring' chat

Had to play conservatively at times last year as we basically came third with a midtable squad

This year sure we'll be more entertaining

It's a reputation earned by the PO semi-final against Fulham, which is all most really know us for.

Teams/fans then get frustrated at not having the ball, and would rather blame us than admit their own failings. They, for some unexplained reason, had yesterday down as an easy home win.

Part of the problem is that many teams play negatively against us, putting men behind the ball so we have no space, hoping to catch us on the break. It doesn't make for a great spectacle. Maybe the classic example is Leeds away last year, where the home side were content to concede possession completely, and just keep us at arm's length. Our inability to break them down somehow got us called boring, rather than the home team who refused to attack.

It's a reputation earned by the PO semi-final against Fulham, which is all most really know us for.

Teams/fans then get frustrated at not having the ball, and would rather blame us than admit their own failings. They, for some unexplained reason, had yesterday down as an easy home win.

Part of the problem is that many teams play negatively against us, putting men behind the ball so we have no space, hoping to catch us on the break. It doesn't make for a great spectacle. Maybe the classic example is Leeds away last year, where the home side were content to concede possession completely, and just keep us at arm's length. Our inability to break them down somehow got us called boring, rather than the home team who refused to attack.

Reading get the label because they seem to have the ball all the time but don't do very much with it around the goal the opponents are defending. Hopefully hat will start to change this season as a lot of wingers/midfielders are being added which will give more options on an attacking front rather than being limited through the constant injury problems that seem to bedevil the team.

It's a reputation earned by the PO semi-final against Fulham, which is all most really know us for.

Teams/fans then get frustrated at not having the ball, and would rather blame us than admit their own failings. They, for some unexplained reason, had yesterday down as an easy home win.

Part of the problem is that many teams play negatively against us, putting men behind the ball so we have no space, hoping to catch us on the break. It doesn't make for a great spectacle. Maybe the classic example is Leeds away last year, where the home side were content to concede possession completely, and just keep us at arm's length. Our inability to break them down somehow got us called boring, rather than the home team who refused to attack.

Reading get the label because they seem to have the ball all the time but don't do very much with it around the goal the opponents are defending.

Why would that bother anyone though? I've never found an opposing team's inability to create chances boring.

The Times has Moore as its Championship Player of the Week, and also has both him and Gunter in the Championship team of the week

When did defending stop being an equally important part of the game. Games are won or lost over 90 plus minutes.

Gunter??? That completely overrated waste of space who only knows how to go backwards, can't defend and is usually the only reason we concede?

Clearly The Times joins all of those club and international managers who haven't got a clue what makes a good player and performance!